ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 outcomes in Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) in comparison to general population patients are unknown. Objectives: To compare mortality and hospitalization of COVID-19 patients with RDs and those without. Methods: We included for this study all the Mexican patients with RDs and COVID-19 registered from April 17th to October 30th, 2020 in the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry. We compare clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with RDs and COVID-19 to patients with COVID-19 that were selected randomly from the Mexican Epidemiology database (1:3). A logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confusion variables. Results: We included 322 patients with COVID-19 and RDs and 969 controls without RDs. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of both groups. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with RDs had higher mortality, were older, and were more frequently hospitalized. Comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular and renal diseases were also more frequent in patients with RDs. In the multivariate analysis, having a RD was no longer associated with mortality (Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients with RDs had higher comorbidities, hospitalizations, and mortality than the general population in the bivariate analysis. However, adjusted multivariate analysis showed that the odds for mortality were not increased because of having a RD. These findings suggest that the increased mortality of Mexican patients with RDs may be explained by the higher frequency of comorbidities in this population.
ABSTRACT
Background: As of the 25th of January 2021, more than 150 thousand deaths as consequence of COVID-19 have been reported in Mexico [1]. Advanced age, male gender and comorbidities have been described as risk factors for severe disease and mortality in general population [2]. COVID-19 mortality in Mexican patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) is unknown. Objectives: To describe characteristics of Mexican patients with RMDs and COVID-19, and to analyse factors associated with mortality. Methods: The Global Rheumatology Alliance COVID-19 (GRA) physician reported registry, is an international effort to collect information on COVID19 in adult patients with RMDs. GRA is an observational registry. The first patient from Mexico was registered on April 17, 2020. All Mexican patients registered in GRA until October 30, 2020 were included in this analysis. The association of mortality with demographic and clinical variables was estimated using logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 323 patients were registered, with a median age of 52 (IQR 41-61) years old, 166 (51.4%) patients lived in Mexico City. The most frequent RMDs were rheumatoid arthritis, 149 (46.1%) and systemic lupus erythematosus, 24 (19.8%). Over a third of patients with RMDs and COVID-19 (119 (36.8%)) were hospitalized, and 43 (13.3%) died. Table 1 shows clinical and demographic characteristics. In the univariable analysis, the absence of comorbidities was a protective factor, OR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-0.6). Factors associated with mortality at COVID-19 diagnosis were age over 65 years old, having type 2 diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, treatment at COVID-19 diagnosis with corticosteroids or with CD20 inhibitors. In the multivariable adjusted analysis, these factors remained independently associated with mortality. No associations with other treatments or comorbidities at COVID-19 diagnosis were found. Conclusion: Mexican patients with RMDs and COVID-19 in the GRA physician reported registry had a mortality of 13.3%. Factors associated with mortality were those described in the general population, such as older age and being on corticosteroids and CD20 inhibitors treatment at COVID-19 diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV2 infection and COVID-19 associated pneumonia are associated to a dysregulated inflammatory response known as cytokine storm and the use of cytokine inhibitors, especially those targeting IL-6, has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative in these patients. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors in combination to the antiviral Remdesivir have shown evidence of reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with COVID-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation1. Objectives: To describe the outcomes associated with the use of Tocilizumab (TCZ) and Baricitinib (Bari) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: Descriptive study nested in a cohort. Patients from the General Hospital of Cuernavaca who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 associated pneumonia and/or respiratory failure requiring supplemental oxygen or invasive/ non-invasive assisted mechanical ventilation (AMV) were analyzed. All patients had a positive RT-PCR upon hospital admission, sampled under standardized conditions. The clinical and demographic data of the patients upon hospitalization were obtained from the instrument on a specific platform (SISVER) used on a national basis. Severe disease was considered as the need for any type of AMV. TCZ was used at 400-600 mg in two infusions (baseline and at 72 hours), Bari at 4 mg daily for 14 days. The outcomes were the need for AMV, death, or discharge. A p≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Data from 404 SARS-CoV2 positive patients were analyzed. 269 (65.9%) were men. The mean age of the patients was 57.5 years (18-94;SD 15.3). 59.6% of the patients had one or more comorbidities (Diabetes and Hypertension in most cases [31.8%]). 22.8% of the patients had a history of current or previous smoking. Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days (1-36;SD 5.9). 15.9% of the patients required invasive or non-invasive AMV. 11 patients were treated with TCZ and 30 patients received treatment with Baricitinib. 5 of the 11 patients with TCZ required AMV (all but one were intubated), but only 6 of the 30 (20%) with Bari required AMV (all except one received CPAP). The use of Baricitinib was correlated with a reduction in the use of AMV (p 0.01). 6 patients with TCZ were discharged due to improvement and 5 died. In the case of Bari, 19 improved and were discharged and 11 died, significantly correlating with lower mortality (p 0.05). The use TCZ was not associated with a reduced hospitalization (50% remained hospitalized for more than 10 days) but patients receiving Baricitinib had significantly shorter hospital stays (86.6% had a hospital stay of less than 10 days) than those receiving TCZ (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The patients that were treated with Baricitinib and required AMV most often improved with non-invasive CPAP while the majority of the patients under AMV receiving TCZ were treated with an invasive mode, although this was due in part to the fact that TCZ can be employed intravenously and is more practical for intubated patients in whom oral drug administration is limited. Baricitinib was significantly associated with a better outcome (hospital discharge due to improvement) and a significantly shorter hospital stay.